← К результатам

Gene Ther · 2022

Two high-fidelity variants: efSaCas9 and SaCas9-HF, which one is better?

Gene therapy, 29(7-8): 458-463 PMID 35095097 DOI 10.1038/s41434-022-00319-4

Открыть в PubMed ↗ Открыть по DOI ↗

Аннотация

CRISPR/Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated endonuclease Cas9) nucleases have been widely applied for genome engineering. Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (SaCas9) is compact, which can be packaged in AAV (adeno-associated virus) vector for in vivo gene editing. While, wild-type SaCas9 can induce unwanted off-target mutations and substantially limits the applications. So far, there are two reported SaCas9 variants with high-fidelity, including efSaCas9 from our previous study and SaCas9-HF. However, it remains unknown which one possessing the better fidelity and higher activity. Here, we performed a parallel comparison of efSaCas9 and SaCas9-HF in human cells through fluorescent reporter system and target deep sequencing, respectively. The results demonstrated that efSaCas9 possesses higher cleavage activity and fidelity than SaCas9-HF at the most endogenous sites in human cells. Collectively, our study provides insights for the rational selection of suitable SaCas9 for human genome editing.

Цитирование