Браузер не даёт сохранять данные (например, приватный режим): закладки пропадут после закрытия вкладки.
Поиск статей PubMed
Ключевые слова, автор, журнал, годы — результаты из PubMed, аннотации с переводом на русский, закладки в браузере.
Найдено: 26 245
Страница 898 из 1000-
Serum extracellular vesicles for delivery of CRISPR-CAS9 ribonucleoproteins to modify the dystrophin gene.
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) mediate intercellular biomolecule exchanges in the body, making them promising delivery vehicles for therapeutic cargo. Genetic engineering by the CRISPR system is an interesting therapeutic avenue for genetic diseases such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). We developed a simple method for loading EVs with CRISPR ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) consisting of SpCas9 proteins and guide RNAs (gRNAs). EVs were first purified from human or mouse serum using ultrafiltration and size-exclusion chromatography. Using protein transfectant to load RNPs into serum EVs, we showed that EVs are good carriers of RNPs in vitro and restored the expression of the tdTomato fluorescent protein in muscle fibers of Ai9 mice. EVs carrying RNPs targeting introns 22 and 24 of the DMD gene were also injected into muscles of mdx mice having a non-sense mutation in exon 23. Up to 19% of the cDNA extracted from treated mdx mice had the intended deletion of exons 23 and 24, allowing dystrophin expression in muscle fibers. RNPs alone, without EVs, were inefficient in generating detectable deletions in mouse muscles. This method opens new opportunities for rapid and safe delivery of CRISPR components to treat DMD.
-
Web-Based CRISPR Toolkits: Cas-OFFinder, Cas-Designer, and Cas-Analyzer.
The CRISPR-Cas system facilitates highly efficient genome editing; thus, it has been applied in many research fields such as biological science, medicine, and gene therapy. However, CRISPR nucleases can cleave off-target sites as well as on-target sites, causing unwanted mutations. Furthermore, after CRISPR treatments are delivered into cells or organisms, it is important to estimate the resulting mutation rates and to determine the patterns of mutations, but these tasks can be difficult. To address these issues, we have developed a tool for identifying potential off-target sites (Cas-OFFinder), a tool for designing CRISPR targets (Cas-Designer), and an assessment tool (Cas-Analyzer). These programs are all implemented on our website so that researchers can easily design CRISPR guide RNAs and assess the resulting mutations by simply clicking on the appropriate buttons; no login process is required.
-
WHO: Are You Ready for Human Genome Editing?
-
CRISPR-SCReT (CRISPR-Stop Codon Read Through) method to control Cas9 expression for gene editing.
CRISPR/Cas9 has paved the way for the development of therapies that correct genetic mutations. However, constitutive expression of the Cas9 gene can increase off-target mutations and induce an immune response against the Cas9 protein. To limit the time during which the Cas9 nuclease is expressed, we proposed a simple drug inducible system. The approach consists of introducing a premature termination codon (PTC) in the Cas9 gene and subsequently treating with an aminoglycoside drug, which allows readthrough of the complete protein. To validate that system, HEK293T cells were co-transfected with a PX458 plasmid, which was mutated to introduce a PTC in the SpCas9 gene and two sgRNAs targeting the DMD gene (exons 50 and 54). Cells were treated with different doses of geneticin (G418) for 48 h. Western blot confirmed that the Cas9 protein expression, which was shut down by the PTC mutation, can be induced by the drug. The hybrid exon 50-54 formed by the deletion of part of the DMD gene was detected by PCR only in the cells treated with G418. The approach was also used successfully with CjCas9 to edit the FXN gene. Our results show that it is possible to control SpCas9 and CjCas9 expression by CRISPR-SCReT (CRISPR-Stop Codon Read Through) method.
-
Models of Technology Transfer for Genome-Editing Technologies.
Many of the fundamental inventions of genome editing, including meganucleases, zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and CRISPR, were first made at universities and patented to encourage commercial development. This gave rise to a diversity of technology transfer models but also conflicts among them. Against a broader historical and policy backdrop of university patenting and special challenges concerning research tools, we review the patent estates of genome editing and the diversity of technology transfer models employed to commercialize them, including deposit in the public domain, open access contracts, material transfer agreements, nonexclusive and exclusive licenses, surrogate licenses, and aggregated licenses. Advantages are found in this diversity, allowing experimentation and competition that we characterize as a federalism model of technology transfer. A notable feature of genome editing has been the rise and success of third-party licensing intermediaries. At the same time, the rapid pace of development of genome-editing technology is likely to erode the importance of patent estates and licensing regimes and may mitigate the effect of overly broad patents, giving rise to new substitutes to effectuate commercialization.
-
CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing: a novel strategy for fighting drug resistance in respiratory disorders.
Respiratory disorders are among the conditions that affect the respiratory system. The healthcare sector faces challenges due to the emergence of drug resistance to prescribed medications for these illnesses. However, there is a technology called CRISPR/Cas9, which uses RNA to guide DNA targeting. This technology has revolutionized our ability to manipulate and visualize the genome, leading to advancements in research and treatment development. It can effectively reverse epigenetic alterations that contribute to drug resistance. Some studies focused on health have shown that targeting genes using CRISPR/Cas9 can be challenging when it comes to reducing drug resistance in patients with respiratory disorders. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of this technology, such as off-target effects, immune system reactions to Cas9, and challenges associated with delivery methods. Despite these limitations, this review aims to provide knowledge about CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing tools and explore how they can help overcome resistance in patients with respiratory disorders. Additionally, this study discusses concerns related to applications of CRISPR and provides an overview of successful clinical trial studies.
-
Protocol for streamlining genotyping of germline-transmissible mutants from genome editing by using a parallel qPCR-based index and R analysis.
Targeted genome editing using CRISPR-Cas, ZFNs, or TALENs enables precise gene function studies but often produces point mutations or insertions or deletions (indels) that are difficult to detect by conventional PCR. We developed a parallel qPCR assay with an iGenotype index for simple, reliable genotyping. iGenotype values (1, 0, -1) remained constant across allele-specific primers. qPCR data can be analyzed via an R program, enabling large-scale or automated genotyping. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Fu et al.1.
-
Highly frequent undesired insertional mutagenesis during Drosophila genome editing.
CRISPR/Cas9 based genome editing employing Homology Directed Repair (HDR) from template vector sequences is a widely used technique to enable precise insertions, deletions or modifications to genes. Here, we describe an undesired and highly frequent editing event when using conventional CRISPR/Cas9 plus HDR methods for Drosophila melanogaster germline genome editing. We find that the template vector employed for HDR repair unwantedly and commonly inserts into the genome. We observe this deviation from the desired edit at multiple genomic locations, with different HDR vectors and with multiple genome editing designs. To avoid these events, we have generated a novel HDR template vector that enables animals with these undesired insertions to be identified and excluded. Our results suggest that HDR based genome edited animals must be carefully screened for unwanted vector template genomic integration in order to avoid misleading interpretations of genome editing outcomes.
-
Recent advances in genome editing of stem cells for drug discovery and therapeutic application.
Genome engineering technologies right from viral vector-mediated to protein-based editing- which include zinc finger nucleases, TALENs, and CRISPR/Cas systems-have been improved significantly. These technologies have facilitated drug discovery and have resulted in the development of potential curative therapies for many intractable diseases. They can efficiently correct genetic errors; however, these technologies have limitations, such as off-target effects and possible safety issues, which need to be considered when employing these techniques in humans. Significant efforts have been made to overcome these limitations and to accelerate the clinical implementation of these technologies. In this review, we focus on the recent technological advancements in genome engineering and their applications in stem cells to enable efficient discovery of drugs and treatment of intractable diseases.
-
Delivery Aspects of CRISPR/Cas for in Vivo Genome Editing.
The discovery of CRISPR/Cas has revolutionized the field of genome editing. CRIPSR/Cas components are part of the bacterial immune system and are able to induce double-strand DNA breaks in the genome, which are resolved by endogenous DNA repair mechanisms. The most relevant of these are the error-prone nonhomologous end joining and homology directed repair pathways. The former can lead to gene knockout by introduction of insertions and deletions at the cut site, while the latter can be used for gene correction based on a provided repair template. In this Account, we focus on the delivery aspects of CRISPR/Cas for therapeutic applications in vivo. Safe and effective delivery of the CRISPR/Cas components into the nucleus of affected cells is essential for therapeutic gene editing. These components can be delivered in several formats, such as pDNA, viral vectors, or ribonuclear complexes. In the ideal case, the delivery system should address the current limitations of CRISPR gene editing, which are (1) lack of targeting specific tissues or cells, (2) the inability to enter cells, (3) activation of the immune system, and (4) off-target events. To circumvent most of these problems, initial therapeutic applications of CRISPR/Cas were performed on cells ex vivo via classical methods (e.g., microinjection or electroporation) and novel methods (e.g., TRIAMF and iTOP). Ideal candidates for such methods are, for example, hematopoietic cells, but not all tissue types are suited for ex vivo manipulation. For direct in vivo application, however, delivery systems are needed that can target the CRISPR/Cas components to specific tissues or cells in the human body, without causing immune activation or causing high frequencies of off-target effects. Viral systems have been used as a first resort to transduce cells in vivo. These systems suffer from problems related to packaging constraints, immunogenicity, and longevity of Cas expression, which favors off-target events. Viral vectors are as such not the best choice for direct in vivo delivery of CRISPR/Cas. Synthetic vectors can deliver nucleic acids as well, without the innate disadvantages of viral vectors. They can be classed into lipid, polymeric, and inorganic particles, all of which have been reported in the literature. The advantage of synthetic systems is that they can deliver the CRISPR/Cas system also as a preformed ribonucleoprotein complex. The transient nature of this approach favors low frequencies of off-target events and minimizes the window of immune activation. Moreover, from a pharmaceutical perspective, synthetic delivery systems are much easier to scale up for clinical use compared to viral vectors and can be chemically functionalized with ligands to obtain target cell specificity. The first preclinical results with lipid nanoparticles delivering CRISPR/Cas either as mRNA or ribonucleoproteins are very promising. The goal is translating these CRISPR/Cas therapeutics to a clinical setting as well. Taken together, these current trends seem to favor the use of sgRNA/Cas ribonucleoprotein complexes delivered in vivo by synthetic particles.
PubMed отдаёт не больше 10 000 первых результатов — уточните запрос, чтобы увидеть остальные.