PubMed · NCBI

Поиск статей PubMed

Ключевые слова, автор, журнал, годы — результаты из PubMed, аннотации с переводом на русский, закладки в браузере.

Найдено: 26 233

Страница 838 из 1000
  1. Funct Integr Genomics · 2025 · PMID 41136797

    Artificial intelligence-driven epigenetic CRISPR therapeutics: a structured multi-domain meta-analysis of therapeutic efficacy, off-target prediction, and gRNA optimization.

    Basarali MK, Daemi A, Tahiraga RG, Özbolat G, Hooshiar MH, Shirazi MSR et al.

    CRISPR-based epigenetic editing enables reversible regulation of gene expression without permanent DNA modification. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) enhances guide RNA (gRNA) design, off-target prediction, and delivery optimization. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (2015-2025) in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines to evaluate the impact of AI on the precision, safety, and therapeutic efficacy of epigenetic CRISPR tools. From 540 screened records, 58 studies met inclusion criteria, of which 41 provided extractable quantitative data for meta-analysis and 17 contributed to qualitative synthesis. Random-effects models, subgroup analyses, and bias assessments were applied. Pooled analyses demonstrated strong positive effects across three domains: therapeutic efficacy (SMD = 1.67), gRNA optimization (SMD = 1.44), and off-target prediction (AUC = 0.79). Publication bias was minimal, and subgroup analyses indicated the strongest impact in therapeutic applications. Deep learning models were consistently associated with higher effect sizes. Qualitative synthesis revealed trends in interpretable AI, omics integration, and delivery innovations, underscoring AI's role in safer and more precise CRISPR editing. Overall, AI significantly improves the precision and therapeutic performance of CRISPR-based epigenetic tools, with the strongest effects observed in therapeutic efficacy, supporting their potential for personalized gene editing.

    PubMed ↗
  2. FEMS Yeast Res · 2024 · PMID 39179418

    Oligonucleotide-based CRISPR-Cas9 toolbox for efficient engineering of Komagataella phaffii.

    Strucko T, Gadar-Lopez AE, Frøhling FB, Frost ET, Iversen EF, Olsson H et al.

    Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris) is a methylotrophic yeast that is favored by industry and academia mainly for expression of heterologous proteins. However, its full potential as a host for bioproduction of valuable compounds cannot be fully exploited as genetic tools are lagging behind those that are available for baker's yeast. The emergence of CRISPR-Cas9 technology has significantly improved the efficiency of gene manipulations of K. phaffii, but improvements in gene-editing methods are desirable to further accelerate engineering of this yeast. In this study, we have developed a versatile vector-based CRISPR-Cas9 method and showed that it works efficiently at different genetic loci using linear DNA fragments with very short targeting sequences including single-stranded oligonucleotides. Notably, we performed site-specific point mutations and full gene deletions using short (90 nt) single-stranded oligonucleotides at very high efficiencies. Lastly, we present a strategy for transient inactivation of nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway, where KU70 gene is disrupted by a visual marker (uidA gene). This system enables precise CRISPR-Cas9-based editing (including multiplexing) and facilitates simple reversion to NHEJ-proficient genotype. In conclusion, the tools presented in this study can be applied for easy and efficient engineering of K. phaffii strains and are compatible with high-throughput automated workflows.

    PubMed ↗
  3. Nat Plants · 2020 · PMID 32601419

    Highly efficient DNA-free plant genome editing using virally delivered CRISPR-Cas9.

    Ma X, Zhang X, Liu H, Li Z

    Genome-editing technologies using CRISPR-Cas nucleases have revolutionized plant science and hold enormous promise in crop improvement. Conventional transgene-mediated CRISPR-Cas reagent delivery methods may be associated with unanticipated genome changes or damage1,2, with prolonged breeding cycles involving foreign DNA segregation and with regulatory restrictions regarding transgenesis3. Therefore, DNA-free delivery has been developed by transfecting preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins into protoplasts4 or in vitro fertilized zygotes5. However, technical difficulties in regeneration from these wall-less cells make impractical a general adaption of these approaches to most crop species. Alternatively, CRISPR-Cas ribonucleoproteins or RNA transcripts have been biolistically bombarded into immature embryo cells or calli to yield highly specific genome editing, albeit at low frequency6-9. Here we report the engineering of a plant negative-strand RNA virus-based vector for DNA-free in planta delivery of the entire CRISPR-Cas9 cassette to achieve single, multiplex mutagenesis and chromosome deletions at high frequency in a model allotetraploid tobacco host. Over 90% of plants regenerated from virus-infected tissues without selection contained targeted mutations, among which up to 57% carried tetra-allelic, inheritable mutations. The viral vector remained stable even after mechanical transmission, and can readily be eliminated from mutated plants during regeneration or after seed setting. Despite high on-target activities, off-target effects, if any, are minimal. Our study provides a convenient, highly efficient and cost-effective approach for CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in plants through virus infection.

    PubMed ↗
  4. Methods · 2020 · PMID 31150759

    CRISPRi as an efficient tool for gene repression in archaea.

    Stachler AE, Schwarz TS, Schreiber S, Marchfelder A

    In the years following its discovery and characterization, the CRISPR-Cas system has been modified and converted into a multitude of applications for eukaryotes and bacteria, such as genome editing and gene regulation. Since no such method has been available for archaea, we developed a tool for gene repression in the haloarchaeon Haloferax volcanii by repurposing its endogenous type I-B CRISPR-Cas system. Here, we present the two possible approaches for gene repression as well as our workflow to achieve and assess gene knockdown, offer recommendations on protospacer selection and give some examples of genes we have successfully silenced.

    PubMed ↗
  5. Int J Mol Sci · 2022 · PMID 35216252

    Effect of Aphidicolin, a Reversible Inhibitor of Eukaryotic Nuclear DNA Replication, on the Production of Genetically Modified Porcine Embryos by CRISPR/Cas9.

    Navarro-Serna S, Piñeiro-Silva C, Luongo C, Parrington J, Romar R, Gadea J

    Mosaicism is the most important limitation for one-step gene editing in embryos by CRISPR/Cas9 because cuts and repairs sometimes take place after the first DNA replication of the zygote. To try to minimize the risk of mosaicism, in this study a reversible DNA replication inhibitor was used after the release of CRISPR/Cas9 in the cell. There is no previous information on the use of aphidicolin in porcine embryos, so the reversible inhibition of DNA replication and the effect on embryo development of different concentrations of this drug was first evaluated. The effect of incubation with aphidicolin was tested with CRISPR/Cas9 at different concentrations and different delivery methodologies. As a result, the reversible inhibition of DNA replication was observed, and it was concentration dependent. An optimal concentration of 0.5 μM was established and used for subsequent experiments. Following the use of this drug with CRISPR/Cas9, a halving of mosaicism was observed together with a detrimental effect on embryo development. In conclusion, the use of reversible inhibition of DNA replication offers a way to reduce mosaicism. Nevertheless, due to the reduction in embryo development, it would be necessary to reach a balance for its use to be feasible.

    PubMed ↗
  6. Hastings Cent Rep · 2017 · PMID 28543411

    Crowdsourcing the Moral Limits of Human Gene Editing?

    Juengst ET

    In 2015, a flourish of "alarums and excursions" by the scientific community propelled CRISPR/Cas9 and other new gene-editing techniques into public attention. At issue were two kinds of potential gene-editing experiments in humans: those making inheritable germ-line modifications and those designed to enhance human traits beyond what is necessary for health and healing. The scientific consensus seemed to be that while research to develop safe and effective human gene editing should continue, society's moral uncertainties about these two kinds of experiments needed to be better resolved before clinical trials of either type should be attempted. In the United States, the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) convened the Committee on Human Gene Editing: Scientific, Medical and Ethical Considerations to pursue that resolution. The committee's 2017 consensus report has been widely interpreted as "opening the door" to inheritable human genetic modification and holding a line against enhancement interventions. But on a close reading it does neither. There are two reasons for this eccentric conclusion, both of which depend upon the strength of the committee's commitment to engaging diverse public voices in the gene-editing policy-making process.

    PubMed ↗
  7. Postepy Biochem · 2018 · PMID 30652832

    [Gene editing].

    Węgleński P

    Development of the gene engineering techniques has raised worries that they will be used for construction of organism endangering humans and environment. In 1975 at the Asilomar conference, geneticists from many countries decided that genetic engineering brings more benefits than threats. In last years a new CRISPR-Cas technique emerged . It allows to make the precise changes in genomes, e.g. to inactivate particular genes or to replace mutated genes by their wild-type alleles. Inactivation in mice of genes corresponding to those whose mutations cause the genetic diseases in man allows to get model organisms for studying the etiology of given disease and for working out the methods of its curing. This technique can be applied for repairing genes whose mutations result in metabolic diseases and cancer. Some voices were raised that the technique can be potentially used for the "improvement" of man, what would create many ethical and social problems. Geneticists, ethicists and lawyers gathered in 2015 at the Washington conference, discussed these problems and proposed rules for their solving.

    PubMed ↗
  8. Dis Model Mech · 2021 · PMID 34296745

    Transient, flexible gene editing in zebrafish neutrophils and macrophages for determination of cell-autonomous functions.

    Isiaku AI, Zhang Z, Pazhakh V, Manley HR, Thompson ER, Fox LC et al.

    Zebrafish are an important model for studying phagocyte function, but rigorous experimental systems to distinguish whether phagocyte-dependent effects are neutrophil or macrophage specific have been lacking. We have developed and validated transgenic lines that enable superior demonstration of cell-autonomous neutrophil and macrophage genetic requirements. We coupled well-characterized neutrophil- and macrophage-specific Gal4 driver lines with UAS:Cas9 transgenes for selective expression of Cas9 in either neutrophils or macrophages. Efficient gene editing, confirmed by both Sanger and next-generation sequencing, occurred in both lineages following microinjection of efficacious synthetic guide RNAs into zebrafish embryos. In proof-of-principle experiments, we demonstrated molecular and/or functional evidence of on-target gene editing for several genes (mCherry, lamin B receptor, trim33) in either neutrophils or macrophages as intended. These new UAS:Cas9 tools provide an improved resource for assessing individual contributions of neutrophil- and macrophage-expressed genes to the many physiological processes and diseases modelled in zebrafish. Furthermore, this gene-editing functionality can be exploited in any cell lineage for which a lineage-specific Gal4 driver is available. This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.

    PubMed ↗
  9. J Alzheimers Dis · 2018 · PMID 29480201

    Generation of a New Tau Knockout (tauΔex1) Line Using CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Mice.

    Tan DCS, Yao S, Ittner A, Bertz J, Ke YD, Ittner LM et al.

    Alzheimer's disease and other dementias present with tau pathology. Several mouse lines with knockout of the tau-encoding Mapt gene have been reported, yet findings often differed between lines and sites. Here, we report a new tau knockout strain (tauΔex1), generated by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing of intron -1/exon 1 of Mapt in C57Bl/6J mice. TauΔex1 mice had no overt phenotype, but, in line with previous models, they showed a significantly reduced susceptibility to excitotoxic seizures, with normal memory formation in young mice. This new in vivo resource will be made freely available to the research community.

    PubMed ↗
  10. Planta · 2026 · PMID 42888353

    The CRISPR-dCas9 epigenetic toolbox: prospects for modulating gene expression in climate-resilient crops.

    Quyoom B, Peer LA

    CRISPR-dCas9 epigenome editing represents a paradigm shift from static DNA sequence editing to dynamic reprogramming of gene expression, offering a powerful and precise toolbox with the potential to develop stable and climate-resilient crops without altering DNA sequences. The escalating challenges of global food security, driven by climate change and population growth, necessitate innovative crop improvement strategies that extend beyond conventional breeding. Although CRISPR-Cas9 has revolutionized plant biotechnology through direct genome editing, CRISPR-based epigenome editing has emerged as a new frontier. By repurposing nuclease-dead Cas9 as a programmable targeting platform fused to epigenetic effector domains, researchers can precisely modulate gene expression without altering the DNA sequence. This approach has already yielded compelling successes, such as the engineering of durable resistance to cassava bacterial blight through targeted epigenetic silencing of a susceptibility gene. This review focuses primarily on the current state of CRISPR-based epigenome editing systems, including acetyltransferases, demethylases, DNA methyltransferases, and deacetylases, and their applications in crop improvement research. We critically evaluate their mechanisms in rewriting epigenetic regulatory information, their demonstrated efficacy in enhancing yield components, disease resistance, and abiotic stress tolerance, and their potential to create stable meiotically heritable epialleles, although most demonstrations remain at the proof-of-concept stage in model plants, with field validation in major crops still limited. This review provides a balanced analysis of key challenges, including editing specificity, context-dependency, delivery limitations, and regulatory considerations. Finally, we outline future directions focusing on technological refinement, multi-omics integration, and field validation. Epigenome editing shows promise as a conceptually distinct and transformative approach in crop biotechnology, through targeted modulation of a plant's epigenetic landscape. However, its full potential hinges on overcoming challenges related to stability, predictability, and field-scale validation.

    PubMed ↗

PubMed отдаёт не больше 10 000 первых результатов — уточните запрос, чтобы увидеть остальные.