Браузер не даёт сохранять данные (например, приватный режим): закладки пропадут после закрытия вкладки.
Поиск статей PubMed
Ключевые слова, автор, журнал, годы — результаты из PubMed, аннотации с переводом на русский, закладки в браузере.
Найдено: 26 182
Страница 533 из 1000-
CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing for Tissue-Specific In Vivo Targeting: Nanomaterials and Translational Perspective.
Clustered randomly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs) and its associated endonuclease protein, i.e., Cas9, have been discovered as an immune system in bacteria and archaea; nevertheless, they are now being adopted as mainstream biotechnological/molecular scissors that can modulate ample genetic and nongenetic diseases via insertion/deletion, epigenome editing, messenger RNA editing, CRISPR interference, etc. Many Food and Drug Administration-approved and ongoing clinical trials on CRISPR adopt ex vivo strategies, wherein the gene editing is performed ex vivo, followed by reimplantation to the patients. However, the in vivo delivery of the CRISPR components is still under preclinical surveillance. This review has summarized the nonviral nanodelivery strategies for gene editing using CRISPR/Cas9 and its recent advancements, strategic points of view, challenges, and future aspects for tissue-specific in vivo delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 components using nanomaterials.
-
Tools for Efficient Genome Editing; ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR.
The last two decades have marked significant advancement in the genome editing field. Three generations of programmable nucleases (ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR-Cas system) have been adopted to introduce targeted DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in eukaryotic cells. DNA repair machinery of the cells has been exploited to introduce insertion and deletions (indels) at the targeted DSBs to study function of any gene-of-interest. The resulting indels were generally assumed to be "random" events produced by "error-prone" DNA repair pathways. However, recent advances in computational tools developed to study the Cas9-induced mutations have changed the consensus and implied the "non-randomness" nature of these mutations. Furthermore, CRISPR-centric tools are evolving at an unprecedented pace, for example, base- and prime-editors are the newest developments that have been added to the genome editing toolbox. Altogether, genome editing tools have revolutionized our way of conducting research in life sciences. Here, we present a concise overview of genome editing tools and describe the DNA repair pathways underlying the generation of genome editing outcome.
-
Exploring CRISPR-Cas: The transformative impact of gene editing in molecular biology.
This review traces the evolution of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) technology from a prokaryotic immune mechanism to a versatile tool for precise genome engineering. We compare CRISPR with traditional gene-editing methods like RNA interference (RNAi), zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), emphasizing its advantages in target specificity, multiplexing, and ease of design. We examine various Cas enzyme classes, engineered variants, and their applications in dissecting genetic alterations at the cellular level. The review further explores CRISPR's expanding role in developing disease models using tissues, organoids, and animal systems, enhancing our understanding of disease mechanisms. Finally, we discuss CRISPR's emerging applications in diagnostics and its transformative impact on immunotherapy and cell-based cancer treatments.
-
Modification of the Genome of Domestic Animals.
In the past few years, new technologies have arisen that enable higher efficiency of gene editing. With the increase ease of using gene editing technologies, it is important to consider the best method for transferring new genetic material to livestock animals. Microinjection is a technique that has proven to be effective in mice but is less efficient in large livestock animals. Over the years, a variety of methods have been used for cloning as well as gene transfer including; nuclear transfer, sperm mediated gene transfer (SMGT), and liposome-mediated DNA transfer. This review looks at the different success rate of these methods and how they have evolved to become more efficient. As well as gene editing technologies, including Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and the most recent clustered regulatory interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs). Through the advancements in gene-editing technologies, generating transgenic animals is now more accessible and affordable. The goals of producing transgenic animals are to 1) increase our understanding of biology and biomedical science; 2) increase our ability to produce more efficient animals; and 3) produce disease resistant animals. ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPRs combined with gene transfer methods increase the possibility of achieving these goals.
-
Gene editing and scalable functional genomic screening in Leishmania species using the CRISPR/Cas9 cytosine base editor toolbox LeishBASEedit.
CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing has revolutionised loss-of-function experiments in Leishmania, the causative agent of leishmaniasis. As Leishmania lack a functional non-homologous DNA end joining pathway however, obtaining null mutants typically requires additional donor DNA, selection of drug resistance-associated edits or time-consuming isolation of clones. Genome-wide loss-of-function screens across different conditions and across multiple Leishmania species are therefore unfeasible at present. Here, we report a CRISPR/Cas9 cytosine base editor (CBE) toolbox that overcomes these limitations. We employed CBEs in Leishmania to introduce STOP codons by converting cytosine into thymine and created http://www.leishbaseedit.net/ for CBE primer design in kinetoplastids. Through reporter assays and by targeting single- and multi-copy genes in L. mexicana, L. major, L. donovani, and L. infantum, we demonstrate how this tool can efficiently generate functional null mutants by expressing just one single-guide RNA, reaching up to 100% editing rate in non-clonal populations. We then generated a Leishmania-optimised CBE and successfully targeted an essential gene in a plasmid library delivered loss-of-function screen in L. mexicana. Since our method does not require DNA double-strand breaks, homologous recombination, donor DNA, or isolation of clones, we believe that this enables for the first time functional genetic screens in Leishmania via delivery of plasmid libraries.
-
Adenoviral Vectors Meet Gene Editing: A Rising Partnership for the Genomic Engineering of Human Stem Cells and Their Progeny.
Gene editing permits changing specific DNA sequences within the vast genomes of human cells. Stem cells are particularly attractive targets for gene editing interventions as their self-renewal and differentiation capabilities consent studying cellular differentiation processes, screening small-molecule drugs, modeling human disorders, and testing regenerative medicines. To integrate gene editing and stem cell technologies, there is a critical need for achieving efficient delivery of the necessary molecular tools in the form of programmable DNA-targeting enzymes and/or exogenous nucleic acid templates. Moreover, the impact that the delivery agents themselves have on the performance and precision of gene editing procedures is yet another critical parameter to consider. Viral vectors consisting of recombinant replication-defective viruses are under intense investigation for bringing about efficient gene-editing tool delivery and precise gene-editing in human cells. In this review, we focus on the growing role that adenoviral vectors are playing in the targeted genetic manipulation of human stem cells, progenitor cells, and their differentiated progenies in the context of in vitro and ex vivo protocols. As preamble, we provide an overview on the main gene editing principles and adenoviral vector platforms and end by discussing the possibilities ahead resulting from leveraging adenoviral vector, gene editing, and stem cell technologies.
-
Establishment of a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated system for targeted editing of the MFS gene in mint.
The key message of this study is that we established a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome-editing system for Mentha haplocalyx "738" by optimizing protoplast transient assay and screening effective regulatory elements. Targeted knockout of the MFS gene generated edited mint plants with reduced menthofuran content, offering a strategy for quality improvement of mint essential oil. The commercial value of mint (Mentha spp.) essential oil is often diminished by the presence of undesirable metabolites, notably menthofuran, which impairs flavor and raises safety concerns. This study aimed to develop a robust CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system for mint 738 (Mentha haplocalyx "738") and apply it to disrupt the menthofuran synthase (MFS) gene, thereby redirecting metabolic flux to enhance oil quality. We established an optimized system for high-efficiency protoplast isolation and transient transformation from young mint leaves. Key parameters for enzymatic digestion (1.5% cellulase R10, 0.2% macerozyme R-10, 3 h) and PEG-mediated transformation (40% PEG6000, 0.4 M mannitol, 0.4 M CaCl₂) were systematically determined. Using this platform, we screened endogenous regulatory elements, identifying a truncated mint U6 promoter (HmU6.1-3P) and the tomato SlEF1α promoter as the most effective drivers for sgRNA and Cas9 expression, respectively. A CRISPR/Cas9 vector targeting the MFS gene was constructed and used for Agrobacterium-mediated stable transformation. The positive transgenic mint lines were obtained. Sequencing confirmed heritable mutations at the target sites within the MFS gene in multiple independent lines. The results revealed a substantial decrease in menthofuran content in the essential oil of the edited line #10 compared to the wild-type control, thereby demonstrating a viable strategy for improving mint essential oil quality through genome-editing.
-
Prime editing: therapeutic advances and mechanistic insights.
We are often confronted with a simple question, "which gene editing technique is the best?"; the simple answer is "there isn't one". In 2021, a year after prime editing first made its mark, we evaluated the landscape of this potentially transformative advance in genome engineering towards getting treatments to the clinic [1]. Nearly 20% of the papers we cited were still in pre-print at the time which serves to indicate how early-stage the knowledge base was at that time. Now, three years later, we take a look at the landscape and ask what has been learnt to ensure this tech is broadly accessible, highlighting some key advances, especially those that push this towards the clinic. A big part of the appeal of prime editing is its ability to precisely edit DNA without double stranded breaks, and to install any of the 12 possible single-nucleotide conversion events as well as small insertions and/or deletions, or essentially any combination thereof. Over the last few decades, other transformative and Nobel prize-winning technologies that rely on Watson-Crick base-pairing such as PCR, site-directed mutagenesis, RNA interference, and one might say, "classic" CRISPR, were swiftly adopted across labs around the world because of the speed with which mechanistic rules governing their efficiency were determined. Whilst this perspective focuses on the context of gene therapy applications of prime editing, we also further look at the recent studies which have increased our understanding of the mechanism of PEs and simultaneously improved the efficiency and diversity of the PE toolbox.
-
Gene editing by SSB/CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein in bacteria.
The application of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) for gene editing is commonly used in plants and animals, but its application in bacteria has not been reported. In this study, we employed DNA single-strand binding protein (SSB) to construct an SSB/CRISPR-Cas9 RNP-editing system for non-homologous recombination and homologous recombination gene editing of the upp gene in bacteria. The RNP targeting the upp gene, along with SSB, was introduced into the protoplasts of Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas, and Bacillus subtilis. Transformants were obtained on plates containing 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with gene editing efficiencies (percentage of transformants relative to the number of protoplasts) of 9.75 %, 5.02 %, and 8.37 %, respectively, and sequencing analysis confirmed 100 % non-homologous recombination. When RNP, SSB, and a 100-nucleotide single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide (ssODN) donor were introduced into the protoplasts of these bacteria, transformants were obtained with editing efficiencies of 45.11 %, 30.13 %, and 27.18 %, respectively, and sequencing confirmed 100 % homologous recombination knockout of the upp gene. Additionally, introducing RNP, SSB, and a 100 base-pair double-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide (dsODN) donor containing a tetracycline resistance gene (tetR-dsODN) resulted in transformants on 5-FU plates with editing efficiencies of 35.94 %, 22.46 %, and 19.08 %, respectively, with sequencing confirming 100 % homologous recombination replacement of the upp gene with tetR. These results demonstrate that the SSB/CRISPR-Cas9 RNP system can efficiently, simply, and rapidly edit bacterial genomes without the need for plasmids. This study is the first to report the use of RNP-based gene editing in bacteria.
-
In vitro genome editing rescues parkinsonism phenotypes in induced pluripotent stem cells-derived dopaminergic neurons carrying LRRK2 p.G2019S mutation.
BACKGROUND: The c.G6055A (p.G2019S) mutation in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) is the most prevalent genetic cause of Parkinson's disease (PD). CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing by homology-directed repair (HDR) has been applied to correct the mutation but may create small insertions and deletions (indels) due to double-strand DNA breaks. Adenine base editors (ABEs) could convert targeted A·T to G·C in genomic DNA without double-strand breaks. However, the correction efficiency of ABE in LRRK2 c.G6055A (p.G2019S) mutation remains unknown yet. This study aimed to compare the mutation correction efficiencies and off-target effects between HDR and ABEs in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) carrying LRRK2 c.G6055A (p.G2019S) mutation. METHODS: A set of mutation-corrected isogenic lines by editing the LRRK2 c.G6055A (p.G2019S) mutation in a PD patient-derived iPSC line using HDR or ABE were established. The mutation correction efficacies, off-target effects, and indels between HDR and ABE were compared. Comparative transcriptomic and proteomic analyses between the LRRK2 p.G2019S iPSCs and isogenic control cells were performed to identify novel molecular targets involved in LRRK2-parkinsonism pathways. RESULTS: ABE had a higher correction rate (13/53 clones, 24.5%) than HDR (3/47 clones, 6.4%). Twenty-seven HDR clones (57.4%), but no ABE clones, had deletions, though 14 ABE clones (26.4%) had off-target mutations. The corrected isogenic iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons exhibited reduced LRRK2 kinase activity, decreased phospho-α-synuclein expression, and mitigated neurite shrinkage and apoptosis. Comparative transcriptomic and proteomic analysis identified different gene expression patterns in energy metabolism, protein degradation, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor pathways between the mutant and isogenic control cells. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study envision that ABE could directly correct the pathogenic mutation in iPSCs for reversing disease-related phenotypes in neuropathology and exploring novel pathophysiological targets in PD.
PubMed отдаёт не больше 10 000 первых результатов — уточните запрос, чтобы увидеть остальные.