Браузер не даёт сохранять данные (например, приватный режим): закладки пропадут после закрытия вкладки.
Поиск статей PubMed
Ключевые слова, автор, журнал, годы — результаты из PubMed, аннотации с переводом на русский, закладки в браузере.
Найдено: 26 149
Страница 562 из 1000-
[Genome-editing: focus on the off-target effects].
Breakthroughs of genome-editing in recent years have paved the way to develop new therapeutic strategies. These genome-editing tools mainly include Zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), Transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs), and clustered regulatory interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/Cas-based RNA-guided DNA endonucleases. However, off-target effects are still the major issue in genome editing, and limit the application in gene therapy. Here, we summarized the cause and compared different detection methods of off-targets.
-
One Prime for All Editing.
Many targeted base transversions, insertions, and deletions remain challenging due to the lack of precise and efficient genome editing technologies. Recently, Anzalone et al. reported a versatile approach to achieve all types of genome edits, shedding new light on correcting most genetic variants associated with diseases.
-
Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system.
-
Efficiency of genome editing using modified single-stranded oligodeoxyribonucleotides in human cells.
Single-stranded oligodeoxyribonucleotide (ssODN) gene editing has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy. However, further improvements in efficiency are desired for practical application. The effects of strand length and locked nucleic acid (LNA) modification on ssODN genome editing were investigated by introducing an assay cassette into the genome of HEK293T cells and measuring precise base deletions of eight bases. The introduction of LNAs into ssODNs, five pairs of LNAs at 25-35 nt from the centre and one pair at 20-25 nt, showed approximately 18-fold higher efficiency than unmodified ssODNs of the same length in the study using 70 nt ssODNs. In addition, genome editing efficiency was further improved when LNAs were introduced at the same positions as the 70 nt ssODN, which showed the highest efficiency for the 90 nt ssODN. However, in some cases, the same number of LNA modifications could conversely reduce the efficiency, and the modification positions in the ssODN method were successfully optimised in the present study. Furthermore, the oligo DNA was shown to be effective not only for deletions but also for base substitutions, with an editing efficiency of 0.63% per cell.
-
Mismatch prime editing gRNA increased efficiency and reduced indels.
Prime editing enables precise and efficient genome editing, but its efficacy is hindered by pegRNA's 3' extension, forming secondary structures due to high complementarity with the protospacer. The continuous presence of the prime editing system also leads to unintended indel formation, raising safety concerns for therapeutic applications. To address these challenges, we develop a mismatched pegRNA (mpegRNA) strategy that introduces mismatched bases into the pegRNA protospacer, reducing complementarity and secondary structure formation, and preventing sustained activity. Our findings show that mpegRNA enhances editing efficiency by up to 2.3 times and reduces indel levels by 76.5% without compromising performance. Combining mpegRNA with epegRNA further increases efficiency up to 14-fold, or 2.4-fold in PE4max/PE5max systems, underscoring its potential in research and therapy. AlphaFold 3 analysis suggests that the optimal mpegRNA structure contributes significantly to improved editing outcomes. Overall, mpegRNA advances prime editing technology, improving efficiency while reducing indels.
-
Genomic and epigenetic landscapes drive CRISPR-based genome editing in Bifidobacterium.
Bifidobacterium is a commensal bacterial genus ubiquitous in the human gastrointestinal tract, which is associated with a range of health benefits. The advent of CRISPR-based genome editing technologies provides opportunities to investigate the genetics of important bacteria and transcend the lack of genetic tools in bifidobacteria to study the basis for their health-promoting attributes. Here, we repurpose the endogenous type I-G CRISPR-Cas system and adopt an exogenous CRISPR base editor for genome engineering in B. animalis subsp. lactis, demonstrating that both genomic and epigenetic contexts drive editing outcomes across strains. We reprogrammed the endogenous type I-G system to screen for naturally occurring large deletions up to 27 kb and to generate a 500-bp deletion in tetW to abolish tetracycline resistance. A CRISPR-cytosine base editor was optimized to install C•G-to-T•A amber mutations to resensitize multiple B. lactis strains to tetracycline. Remarkably, we uncovered epigenetic patterns that are distributed unevenly among B. lactis strains, despite their genomic homogeneity, that may contribute to editing efficiency variability. Insights were also expanded to Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis to emphasize the broad relevance of these findings. This study highlights the need to develop individualized CRISPR-based genome engineering approaches for distinct bacterial strains and opens avenues for engineering of next generation probiotics.
-
Genome editing and kidney health.
Genome editing technologies, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas in particular, have revolutionized the field of genetic engineering, providing promising avenues for treating various genetic diseases. Chronic kidney disease (CKD), a significant health concern affecting millions of individuals worldwide, can arise from either monogenic or polygenic mutations. With recent advancements in genomic sequencing, valuable insights into disease-causing mutations can be obtained, allowing for the development of new treatments for these genetic disorders. CRISPR-based treatments have emerged as potential therapies, especially for monogenic diseases, offering the ability to correct mutations and eliminate disease phenotypes. Innovations in genome editing have led to enhanced efficiency, specificity and ease of use, surpassing earlier editing tools such as zinc-finger nucleases and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs). Two prominent advancements in CRISPR-based gene editing are prime editing and base editing. Prime editing allows precise and efficient genome modifications without inducing double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs), while base editing enables targeted changes to individual nucleotides in both RNA and DNA, promising disease correction in the absence of DSBs. These technologies have the potential to treat genetic kidney diseases through specific correction of disease-causing mutations, such as somatic mutations in PKD1 and PKD2 for polycystic kidney disease; NPHS1, NPHS2 and TRPC6 for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; COL4A3, COL4A4 and COL4A5 for Alport syndrome; SLC3A1 and SLC7A9 for cystinuria and even VHL for renal cell carcinoma. Apart from editing the DNA sequence, CRISPR-mediated epigenome editing offers a cost-effective method for targeted treatment providing new avenues for therapeutic development, given that epigenetic modifications are associated with the development of various kidney disorders. However, there are challenges to overcome, including developing efficient delivery methods, improving safety and reducing off-target effects. Efforts to improve CRISPR-Cas technologies involve optimizing delivery vectors, employing viral and non-viral approaches and minimizing immunogenicity. With research in animal models providing promising results in rescuing the expression of wild-type podocin in mouse models of nephrotic syndrome and successful clinical trials in the early stages of various disorders, including cancer immunotherapy, there is hope for successful translation of genome editing to kidney diseases.
-
NMR measurements of transient low-populated tautomeric and anionic Watson-Crick-like G·T/U in RNA:DNA hybrids: implications for the fidelity of transcription and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing.
Many biochemical processes use the Watson-Crick geometry to distinguish correct from incorrect base pairing. However, on rare occasions, mismatches such as G·T/U can transiently adopt Watson-Crick-like conformations through tautomerization or ionization of the bases, giving rise to replicative and translational errors. The propensities to form Watson-Crick-like mismatches in RNA:DNA hybrids remain unknown, making it unclear whether they can also contribute to errors during processes such as transcription and CRISPR/Cas editing. Here, using NMR R1ρ experiments, we show that dG·rU and dT·rG mismatches in two RNA:DNA hybrids transiently form tautomeric (Genol·T/U $ \mathbin{\lower.3ex\hbox{$\buildrel\textstyle\rightarrow\over {\smash{\leftarrow}\vphantom{_{\vbox to.5ex{\vss}}}}$}}$ G·Tenol/Uenol) and anionic (G·T-/U-) Watson-Crick-like conformations. The tautomerization dynamics were like those measured in A-RNA and B-DNA duplexes. However, anionic dG·rU- formed with a ten-fold higher propensity relative to dT-·rG and dG·dT- and this could be attributed to the lower pKa (ΔpKa ∼0.4-0.9) of U versus T. Our findings suggest plausible roles for Watson-Crick-like G·T/U mismatches in transcriptional errors and CRISPR/Cas9 off-target gene editing, uncover a crucial difference between the chemical dynamics of G·U versus G·T, and indicate that anionic Watson-Crick-like G·U- could play a significant role evading Watson-Crick fidelity checkpoints in RNA:DNA hybrids and RNA duplexes.
-
Expanding the editable genome and CRISPR-Cas9 versatility using DNA cutting-free gene targeting based on in trans paired nicking.
Genome editing typically involves recombination between donor nucleic acids and acceptor genomic sequences subjected to double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) made by programmable nucleases (e.g. CRISPR-Cas9). Yet, nucleases yield off-target mutations and, most pervasively, unpredictable target allele disruptions. Remarkably, to date, the untoward phenotypic consequences of disrupting allelic and non-allelic (e.g. pseudogene) sequences have received scant scrutiny and, crucially, remain to be addressed. Here, we demonstrate that gene-edited cells can lose fitness as a result of DSBs at allelic and non-allelic target sites and report that simultaneous single-stranded DNA break formation at donor and acceptor DNA by CRISPR-Cas9 nickases (in trans paired nicking) mostly overcomes such disruptive genotype-phenotype associations. Moreover, in trans paired nicking gene editing can efficiently and precisely add large DNA segments into essential and multiple-copy genomic sites. As shown herein by genotyping assays and high-throughput genome-wide sequencing of DNA translocations, this is achieved while circumventing most allelic and non-allelic mutations and chromosomal rearrangements characteristic of nuclease-dependent procedures. Our work demonstrates that in trans paired nicking retains target protein dosages in gene-edited cell populations and expands gene editing to chromosomal tracts previously not possible to modify seamlessly due to their recurrence in the genome or essentiality for cell function.
-
Engineered Sdd7 cytosine base editors with enhanced specificity.
Cytosine base editors (CBEs) revolutionize genome editing by enabling precise C-to-T conversions without double-strand breaks. Sdd7, a recently developed cytosine deaminase, exhibits high activity across a broad protospacer range but induces unintended off-target effects, including bystander mutations within and upstream of the protospacer and both gRNA-dependent and independent deamination. Here, we report that BE4max and Sdd7 induce bystander editing upstream of the protospacer. To overcome this, we engineer two Sdd7 variants, Sdd7e1 and Sdd7e2, enhancing specificity while preserving on-target efficiency. These variants display reduced bystander editing, narrowed editing windows, and significantly lower off-target activity. Delivery as ribonucleoproteins via engineered virus-like particles (eVLPs) further improves specificity, nearly eliminating bystander edits and increasing precise single-point mutations. Our findings establish Sdd7e1 and Sdd7e2, especially when delivered via eVLP, as high-fidelity CBEs poised for safe, precise therapeutic genome editing.
PubMed отдаёт не больше 10 000 первых результатов — уточните запрос, чтобы увидеть остальные.