PubMed · NCBI

Search PubMed

Keywords, author, journal, years — results from PubMed, abstracts with Russian translation, bookmarks in your browser.

Found: 26 182

Page 990 of 1000
  1. J Biosci · 2020 · PMID 33361628

    Revisiting CRISPR/Cas-mediated crop improvement: Special focus on nutrition.

    Kaul T, Sony SK, Verma R, Motelb KFA, Prakash AT, Eswaran M et al.

    Genome editing (GE) technology has emerged as a multifaceted strategy that instantaneously popularised the mechanism to modify the genetic constitution of an organism. The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) protein-based genome editing (CRISPR/Cas) approach has huge potential for efficacious editing of genomes of numerous organisms. This framework has demonstrated to be more economical in contrast to mega-nucleases, zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) for its flexibility, versatility, and potency. The advent of sequence-specific nucleases (SSNs) allowed the precise induction of double-strand breaks (DSBs) into the genome, ensuring desired alterations through non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HDR) pathways. Researchers have utilized CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome alterations across crop varieties to generate desirable characteristics for yield enhancement, enriched nutritional quality, and stressresistance. Here, we highlighted the recent progress in the area of nutritional improvement of crops via the CRISPR/Cas-based tools for fundamental plant research and crop genetic advancements. Application of this genome editing aids in unraveling the basic biology facts in plants supplemented by the incorporation of genome-wide association studies, artificial intelligence, and various bioinformatic frameworks, thereby providing futuristic model studies and their affirmations. Strategies for reducing the 'off-target' effects and the societal approval of genome-modified crops developed via this modern biotechnological approach have been reviewed.

    PubMed ↗
  2. Biotechnol J · 2018 · PMID 29544035

    Enhancing CHO by Systems Biotechnology.

    Borth N, Hu WS

    No abstract

    PubMed ↗
  3. STAR Protoc · 2023 · PMID 36853698

    Heritable CRISPR-Cas9 editing of plant genomes using RNA virus vectors.

    Uranga M, Aragonés V, Daròs JA, Pasin F

    Viral vectors hold enormous potential for genome editing in plants as transient delivery vehicles of CRISPR-Cas components. Here, we describe a protocol to assemble plant viral vectors for single-guide RNA (sgRNA) delivery. The obtained viral constructs are based on compact T-DNA binary vectors of the pLX series and are delivered into Cas9-expressing plants through agroinoculation. This approach allows rapidly assessing sgRNA design for plant genome targeting, as well as the recovery of progeny with heritable mutations at targeted loci. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Uranga et al. (2021)1 and Aragonés et al. (2022).2.

    PubMed ↗
  4. Methods Mol Biol · 2021 · PMID 33977487

    A Facile Method to Engineer Mutant Kras Alleles in an Isogenic Cell Background.

    Budagyan K, Chernoff J

    Oncogenic KRAS mutations are common in colorectal cancer (CRC), found in ~50% of tumors, and are associated with poor prognosis and resistance to therapy. There is substantial diversity of KRAS mutations observed in CRC. Importantly, emerging clinical and experimental analysis of relatively common KRAS mutations at amino acids G12, G13, A146, and Q61 suggest that each mutation differently influences the clinical properties of a disease and response to therapy. Although clinical evidence suggests biological differences between mutant KRAS alleles, these differences and the mechanisms underlying them are not well understood, and further exploration of allele-specific differences may provide evidence for individualized therapeutics. One approach to study allelic variation involves the use of isogenic cell lines that express different endogenous KRAS mutants. Here we developed an assay using fluorescent co-selection for CRISPR-driven gene editing to generate various Kras mutations in an isogenic murine colon epithelial cell line background. This assay involves generation of a cell line stably expressing Cas9 linked to BFP and simultaneous introduction of single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) to two different gene loci resulting in double-editing events. Single-stranded donor oligonucleotides are introduced for a GFP gene and a Kras mutant allele of our choice as templates for homologous recombination (HDR). Cells that successfully undergo HDR are GFP-positive and have a higher probability of containing the desired Kras mutation. Therefore, selection for GFP-positive cells allows us to identify those with phenotypically silent Kras edits. Ultimately, this method allows us to toggle between different mutant alleles and preserve the wild-type allele while maintaining an isogenic background.

    PubMed ↗
  5. Hastings Cent Rep · 2017 · PMID 28746759

    Is De-extinction Special?

    Greely HT

    I have been involved with the current interest in de-extinction since early 2012, nearly its beginning. I have given a lot of thought to the potential risks and benefits of de-extinction. But only recently, after deep immersion in discussions around CRISPR-Cas9, the hottest new tool in bioscience since polymerase chain reaction, have I thought about a more fundamental question: how, if at all, is de-extinction special? Are "revived species" just another kind of genetically modified organism, raising essentially the same general concerns? I answer, for the most part, yes. De-extinction is not (very) special. New biotechnologies are giving humans even more power to change the biosphere but more directly, more quickly, and more utterly than ever before. De-extinction is just one possible, and probably small, use of those technologies. Our attention, for the most part, should be on the bigger issues of regulating this power, rather than focusing specifically on their application to de-extinction.

    PubMed ↗
  6. Cells · 2020 · PMID 32252479

    High-Capacity Adenoviral Vectors Permit Robust and Versatile Testing of DMD Gene Repair Tools and Strategies in Human Cells.

    Brescia M, Janssen JM, Liu J, Gonçalves MAFV

    Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a fatal X-linked muscle wasting disorder arising from mutations in the ~2.4 Mb dystrophin-encoding DMD gene. RNA-guided CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases (RGNs) are opening new DMD therapeutic routes whose bottlenecks include delivering sizable RGN complexes for assessing their effects on human genomes and testing ex vivo and in vivo DMD-correcting strategies. Here, high-capacity adenoviral vectors (HC-AdVs) encoding single or dual high-specificity RGNs with optimized components were investigated for permanently repairing defective DMD alleles either through exon 51-targeted indel formation or major mutational hotspot excision (>500 kb), respectively. Firstly, we establish that, at high doses, third-generation HC-AdVs lacking all viral genes are significantly less cytotoxic than second-generation adenoviral vectors deleted in E1 and E2A. Secondly, we demonstrate that genetically retargeted HC-AdVs can correct up to 42% ± 13% of defective DMD alleles in muscle cell populations through targeted removal of the major mutational hotspot, in which over 60% of frame-shifting large deletions locate. Both DMD gene repair strategies tested readily led to the detection of Becker-like dystrophins in unselected muscle cell populations, leading to the restoration of β-dystroglycan at the plasmalemma of differentiated muscle cells. Hence, HC-AdVs permit the effective assessment of DMD gene-editing tools and strategies in dystrophin-defective human cells while broadening the gamut of DMD-correcting agents.

    PubMed ↗
  7. J Am Chem Soc · 2018 · PMID 29668265

    Receptor-Mediated Delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 Endonuclease for Cell-Type-Specific Gene Editing.

    Rouet R, Thuma BA, Roy MD, Lintner NG, Rubitski DM, Finley JE et al.

    CRISPR-Cas RNA-guided endonucleases hold great promise for disrupting or correcting genomic sequences through site-specific DNA cleavage and repair. However, the lack of methods for cell- and tissue-selective delivery currently limits both research and clinical uses of these enzymes. We report the design and in vitro evaluation of S. pyogenes Cas9 proteins harboring asialoglycoprotein receptor ligands (ASGPrL). In particular, we demonstrate that the resulting ribonucleoproteins (Cas9-ASGPrL RNP) can be engineered to be preferentially internalized into cells expressing the corresponding receptor on their surface. Uptake of such fluorescently labeled proteins in liver-derived cell lines HEPG2 (ASGPr+) and SKHEP (control; diminished ASGPr) was studied by live cell imaging and demonstrates increased accumulation of Cas9-ASGPrL RNP in HEPG2 cells as a result of effective ASGPr-mediated endocytosis. When uptake occurred in the presence of a peptide with endosomolytic properties, we observed receptor-facilitated and cell-type specific gene editing that did not rely on electroporation or the use of transfection reagents. Overall, these in vitro results validate the receptor-mediated delivery of genome-editing enzymes as an approach for cell-selective gene editing and provide a framework for future potential applications to hepatoselective gene editing in vivo.

    PubMed ↗
  8. Curr Protoc Cell Biol · 2018 · PMID 30178917

    Genome Editing in Mice Using CRISPR/Cas9 Technology.

    Hall B, Cho A, Limaye A, Cho K, Khillan J, Kulkarni AB

    CRISPR/Cas9 technology has revolutionized genome editing in mice, allowing for simple and rapid development of knockouts and knockins. CRISPR relies on small guide RNAs that direct the RNA-guided nuclease Cas9 to a designated genomic site using ∼20 bp of corresponding sequence. Cas9 then creates a double-strand break in the targeted loci that is either patched in an error-prone fashion to produce a frame-shift mutation, a knockout, or is repaired by recombination with donor DNA containing homology arms, a knockin. This protocol covers the techniques needed to rapidly generate knockout and knockin mice with CRISPR via microinjection of Cas9, the guide RNA, and possible donor DNA into the mouse zygote. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    PubMed ↗
  9. Nucleic Acids Res · 2024 · PMID 38795068

    AlPaCas: allele-specific CRISPR gene editing through a protospacer-adjacent-motif (PAM) approach.

    Rosignoli S, Lustrino E, Conci A, Fabrizi A, Rinaldo S, Latella MC et al.

    Gene therapy of dominantly inherited genetic diseases requires either the selective disruption of the mutant allele or the editing of the specific mutation. The CRISPR-Cas system holds great potential for the genetic correction of single nucleotide variants (SNVs), including dominant mutations. However, distinguishing between single-nucleotide variations in a pathogenic genomic context remains challenging. The presence of a PAM in the disease-causing allele can guide its precise targeting, preserving the functionality of the wild-type allele. The AlPaCas (Aligning Patients to Cas) webserver is an automated pipeline for sequence-based identification and structural analysis of SNV-derived PAMs that satisfy this demand. When provided with a gene/SNV input, AlPaCas can: (i) identify SNV-derived PAMs; (ii) provide a list of available Cas enzymes recognizing the SNV (s); (iii) propose mutational Cas-engineering to enhance the selectivity towards the SNV-derived PAM. With its ability to identify allele-specific genetic variants that can be targeted using already available or engineered Cas enzymes, AlPaCas is at the forefront of advancements in genome editing. AlPaCas is open to all users without a login requirement and is freely available at https://schubert.bio.uniroma1.it/alpacas.

    PubMed ↗
  10. BMC Genomics · 2025 · PMID 40045211

    Cas9-expressing cattle using the PiggyBac transposon all-in-one system.

    Kwon DH, Gim GM, Yum SY, Eom KH, Lee SJ, Han SE et al.

    BACKGROUND: Livestock, particularly cattle, are crucial for biotechnology fields, such as genetic breeding, infectious diseases, bioreactors, and specific disease models. However, genetic engineering in cattle has lagged due to long gestation periods, single embryo pregnancies, and high rearing costs. Additionally, the slow validation of germline transmission and the absence of germline-competent embryonic stem cells hinder progress. With the development of genome editing technologies like ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR-Cas9, recent advancements have shown that Cas9-expressing pigs and chickens have been successfully produced. We hypothesize that generating CRISPR/Cas9-expressing cattle and their resources will provide a powerful resource for bovine genome editing, advancing our understanding of bovine genetics and disease resistance. RESULTS: In this study, two types of Cas9-expressing cattle were successfully produced: Cas9-RFP-fatty acid dehydrogenase I (FatI), Cas9-GFP-sgRNA for the prion protein (sgPRNP). Somatic cells from these cattle were induced to mutate multiple target genes when single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were transfected into the somatic cells. Additionally, semen from Cas9 expressing male cattle was frozen and used to fertilize wild-type oocytes, successfully transmitting the transgene (Cas9, reporter genes, FatI), and sgPRNP) to the next generation. Furthermore, the gene editing capabilities of Cas9, including knockout and high-efficiency knock-in, were confirmed in embryos derived from F1 semen through in vitro production. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate, for the first time, that Cas9-expressing cattle were successfully born, and this transgene was transmitted to the next-generation calves (F1) and F2 embryos. In addition, somatic and germ cells derived from F0 and F1generations were used to evaluate the potential for gene editing (knockout and knock-in) in multiple genes. PRNP-mutated F1 cattle are currently being raised as a resistance model for bovine spongiform encephalopathy. These transgenic bovine models and their derivatives will serve as a valuable resource for both in vitro and in vivo genome editing, advancing our genetic understanding of bovine genomics and diseases.

    PubMed ↗

PubMed returns only the first 10,000 results — refine the query to see the rest.