Your browser does not allow saving data (e.g. private mode): bookmarks will be lost when the tab closes.
Search PubMed
Keywords, author, journal, years — results from PubMed, abstracts with Russian translation, bookmarks in your browser.
Found: 26 149
Page 564 of 1000-
CRISPR-Cas9 as a Tool in Cancer Therapy.
BACKGROUND: Genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 has become one of the basic methods of biological research over a short period of time. This recently discovered system of adaptive immunity of bacteria has been adapted to the needs of science and has become a valuable tool for DNA manipulation. Its simplicity and reliability have contributed to widespread use of the method. Genome editing refers to targeted modifications of genomic DNA with single base pair accuracy. CRISPR-Cas9 differs significantly from previous technologies in the simplicity of directing the enzyme to the target sequence. In the field of cancer research, CRISPR-Cas9 has enabled the development of a number of models for the study of carcinogenesis and drug testing. From a therapeutic point of view, CRISPR-Cas9 has been applied in the field of immunotherapy, especially in ex vivo genetic modifications of the T-cells of patients. AIM: Currently, several clinical trials are trying to verify the therapeutic potential of CRISPR-Cas9. Based on these studies, we have summarised the strategies used in the preparation of therapeutic tools useful in cancer therapy. CONCLUSION: CRISPR-Cas9 appears to be crucial in basic research, particularly in the study of the function of individual genes involved in carcinogenesis. However, it will still be necessary to optimise the efficacy, safety and specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 before it is used in clinical practice.
-
DNA mismatch repair and oligonucleotide end-protection promote base-pair substitution distal from a CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA break.
Single-stranded oligodeoxyribonucleotide (ssODN)-mediated repair of CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) can effectively be used to introduce small genomic alterations in a defined locus. Here, we reveal DNA mismatch repair (MMR) activity is crucial for efficient nucleotide substitution distal from the Cas9-induced DNA break when the substitution is instructed by the 3' half of the ssODN. Furthermore, protecting the ssODN 3' end with phosphorothioate linkages enhances MMR-dependent gene editing events. Our findings can be exploited to optimize efficiencies of nucleotide substitutions distal from the DSB and imply that oligonucleotide-mediated gene editing is effectuated by templated break repair.
-
Highly Efficient and Heritable Targeted Mutagenesis in Wheat via the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-Mediated CRISPR/Cas9 System.
The CRISPR/Cas9 system has been successfully used in hexaploid wheat. Although it has been reported that the induced mutations can be passed to the next generation, gene editing and transmission patterns in later generations still need to be studied. In this study, we demonstrated that the CRISPR/Cas9 system could achieve efficient mutagenesis in five wheat genes via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of an sgRNA targeting the D genome, an sgRNA targeting both the A and B homologues and three tri-genome guides targeting the editing of all three homologues. High mutation rates and putative homozygous or biallelic mutations were observed in the T0 plants. The targeted mutations could be stably inherited by the next generation, and the editing efficiency of each mutant line increased significantly across generations. The editing types and inheritance of targeted mutagenesis were similar, which were not related to the targeted subgenome number. The presence of Cas9/sgRNA could cause new mutations in subsequent generations, while mutated lines without Cas9/sgRNA could retain the mutation type. Additionally, off-target mutations were not found in sequences that were highly homologous to the selected sgRNA sequences. Overall, the results suggested that CRISPR/Cas9-induced gene editing via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation plays important roles in wheat genome engineering.
-
Quadruple adenine base-edited allogeneic CAR T cells outperform CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease-engineered T cells.
Genome-editing technologies have enabled the clinical development of allogeneic cellular therapies, yet the optimal gene-editing modality for multiplex editing of therapeutic T cell product manufacturing remains elusive. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive comparison of CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease and adenine base editor (ABE) technologies in generating allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, utilizing extensive in vitro and in vivo analyses. Both methods achieved high editing efficiencies across four target genes, critical for mitigating graft-versus-host disease and allograft rejection: TRAC or CD3E, B2M, CIITA, and PVR. Notably, ABE demonstrated higher manufacturing yields and distinct off-target profiles compared to Cas9, with translocations observed exclusively in Cas9-edited products. Functionally, ABE-edited CAR T cells exhibited superior in vitro effector functions under continuous antigen stimulation, including enhanced proliferative capacity and increased surface CAR expression. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that ABE editing resulted in reduced activation of p53 and DNA damage response pathways at baseline, along with sustained activation of metabolic pathways during antigen stress. Consistently, Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing data indicated that Cas9-edited, but not ABE-edited, CAR T cells showed enrichment of chromatin accessibility peaks associated with double-strand break repair and DNA damage response pathways. In a preclinical leukemia model, ABE-edited CAR T cells demonstrated improved tumor control and extended overall survival compared to their Cas9-edited counterparts. Collectively, these findings position ABE as superior to Cas9 nucleases for multiplex gene editing of therapeutic T cells.
-
The type V effectors for CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering in plants.
A plethora of CRISPR effectors, such as Cas3, Cas9, and Cas12a, are commonly employed as gene editing tools. Among these, Cas12 effectors developed based on Class II type V proteins exhibit distinct characteristics compared to Class II type VI and type II effectors, such as their ability to generate non-allelic DNA double-strand breaks, their compact structures, and the presence of a single RuvC-like nuclease domain. Capitalizing on these advantages, Cas12 family proteins have been increasingly explored and utilized in recent years. However, the characteristics and applications of different subfamilies within the type V protein family have not been systematically summarized. In this review, we focus on the characteristics of type V effector (CRISPR/Cas12) proteins and the current methods used to discover new effector proteins. We also summarize recent modifications based on engineering of type V effectors. In addition, we introduce the applications of type V effectors for gene editing in animals and plants, including the development of base editors, tools for regulating gene expression, methods for gene targeting, and biosensors. We emphasize the prospects for development and application of CRISPR/Cas12 effectors with the goal of better utilizing toolkits based on this protein family for crop improvement and enhanced agricultural production.
-
One small edit for humans, one giant edit for humankind? Points and questions to consider for a responsible way forward for gene editing in humans.
Gene editing, which allows for specific location(s) in the genome to be targeted and altered by deleting, adding or substituting nucleotides, is currently the subject of important academic and policy discussions. With the advent of efficient tools, such as CRISPR-Cas9, the plausibility of using gene editing safely in humans for either somatic or germ line gene editing is being considered seriously. Beyond safety issues, somatic gene editing in humans does raise ethical, legal and social issues (ELSI), however, it is suggested to be less challenging to existing ethical and legal frameworks; indeed somatic gene editing is already applied in (pre-) clinical trials. In contrast, the notion of altering the germ line or embryo such that alterations could be heritable in humans raises a large number of ELSI; it is currently debated whether it should even be allowed in the context of basic research. Even greater ELSI debates address the potential use of germ line or embryo gene editing for clinical purposes, which, at the moment is not being conducted and is prohibited in several jurisdictions. In the context of these ongoing debates surrounding gene editing, we present herein guidance to further discussion and investigation by highlighting three crucial areas that merit the most attention, time and resources at this stage in the responsible development and use of gene editing technologies: (1) conducting careful scientific research and disseminating results to build a solid evidence base; (2) conducting ethical, legal and social issues research; and (3) conducting meaningful stakeholder engagement, education and dialogue.
-
Efficient gene editing through an intronic selection marker in cells.
BACKGROUND: Gene editing technology has provided researchers with the ability to modify genome sequences in almost all eukaryotes. Gene-edited cell lines are being used with increasing frequency in both bench research and targeted therapy. However, despite the great importance and universality of gene editing, the efficiency of homology-directed DNA repair (HDR) is too low, and base editors (BEs) cannot accomplish desired indel editing tasks. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Our group has improved HDR gene editing technology to indicate DNA variation with an independent selection marker using an HDR strategy, which we named Gene Editing through an Intronic Selection marker (GEIS). GEIS uses a simple process to avoid nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ)-mediated false-positive effects and achieves a DsRed positive rate as high as 87.5% after two rounds of fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) selection without disturbing endogenous gene splicing and expression. We re-examined the correlation of the conversion tract and efficiency, and our data suggest that GEIS has the potential to edit approximately 97% of gene editing targets in human and mouse cells. The results of further comprehensive analysis suggest that the strategy may be useful for introducing multiple DNA variations in cells.
-
Immune-evasive stem cells: engineering tolerance and reprogramming microenvironments for regenerative therapy.
Stem cell transplantation (SCT) holds significant promise for regenerative medicine, yet immune rejection remains a major obstacle. To address this, recent advances leverage CRISPR/Cas9 to engineer hypoimmunogenic induced pluripotent stem cells. These modified cells lack classical immune recognition markers (HLA class I/II) yet retain immune-tolerant molecules such as HLA-E, HLA-G, and CD47, enabling their universal use across different individuals. Additionally, mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes and immune checkpoint modulators (e.g., PD-L1) have shown clinical effectiveness by reducing graft-versus-host disease and autoimmune reactions. They achieve this through mechanisms such as suppressing inflammatory T-cell activation, promoting regulatory T-cell expansion, and modulating macrophage polarization. Despite these advances, several challenges remain. One key concern is the potential tumorigenic risk caused by genomic instability during genome editing and long-term cell expansion. Emerging precision editing platforms, including base editing and prime editing, provide strategies to reduce double-strand DNA break-induced chromosomal rearrangements and improve genomic safety. Future research priorities include integrating AI-based immune profiling, precision genome editing, and advanced 3D-bioprinting technologies. Together, these innovations represent a paradigm shift toward developing safer, more effective, universally compatible stem cell therapies for diseases previously deemed untreatable.
-
Deletion and replacement of long genomic sequences using prime editing.
Genomic insertions, duplications and insertion/deletions (indels), which account for ~14% of human pathogenic mutations, cannot be accurately or efficiently corrected by current gene-editing methods, especially those that involve larger alterations (>100 base pairs (bp)). Here, we optimize prime editing (PE) tools for creating precise genomic deletions and direct the replacement of a genomic fragment ranging from ~1 kilobases (kb) to ~10 kb with a desired sequence (up to 60 bp) in the absence of an exogenous DNA template. By conjugating Cas9 nuclease to reverse transcriptase (PE-Cas9) and combining it with two PE guide RNAs (pegRNAs) targeting complementary DNA strands, we achieve precise and specific deletion and repair of target sequences via using this PE-Cas9-based deletion and repair (PEDAR) method. PEDAR outperformed other genome-editing methods in a reporter system and at endogenous loci, efficiently creating large and precise genomic alterations. In a mouse model of tyrosinemia, PEDAR removed a 1.38-kb pathogenic insertion within the Fah gene and precisely repaired the deletion junction to restore FAH expression in liver.
-
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing causes alternative splicing of the targeting mRNA.
The technique of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing has been widely used to specifically delete the selected target genes through generating double strand breaks (DSBs) and inducing insertion and/or deletion (indel) of the genomic DNAs in the cells. We recently applied this technique to disrupt mineral dust-induced gene (mdig), a potential oncogene as previously reported, by single guide RNA (sgRNA) targeting the third exon of mdig gene in several cell types, including human bronchial epithelial cell line BEAS-2B, lung cancer cell line A549, and human triple negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 cells. In addition to the successful knockout of mdig gene in these cells, we unexpectedly noted generation of several alternatively spliced mdig mRNAs. Amplification of the mdig mRNAs during the screening of knockout clones by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the subsequent sanger sequencing of DNA revealed deletion and alternative splicing of mdig mRNAs induced by CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. The most common deletions include nine and twenty-four nucleotides deletion around the DSBs. In addition, interestingly, some mdig mRNAs showed skipping of the entire exon 3, or alternative splicing between exon 2 and exon 8 using the new donor and accept splicing sites, leading to deletion of exons 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Accordingly, cautions should be taken when using CRISPR-Cas9 strategy to edit human genes due to the unintended alterative splicing of the target mRNAs. It is very likely that new proteins, some of which may be highly oncogenic, may be generated from CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing.
PubMed returns only the first 10,000 results — refine the query to see the rest.