Your browser does not allow saving data (e.g. private mode): bookmarks will be lost when the tab closes.
Search PubMed
Keywords, author, journal, years — results from PubMed, abstracts with Russian translation, bookmarks in your browser.
Found: 26 067
Page 42 of 1000-
CRISPR voles can't detect 'love hormone' oxytocin - but still mate for life.
-
Machine learning finds Cas9-edited genotypes.
-
Russian biologist plans more CRISPR-edited babies.
-
[Development and challenges of gene editing technology].
Gene editing is a technique for modifying gene fragments. The novel gene editing technology focuses on the field of artificial nuclease cleavage technology, mainly ZFN technology, TALEN technology, CRISPR technology and base editing technology. The continuous improvement of gene editing technology has promoted the rapid development of agriculture, animal husbandry and biomedicine, but at the same time, technical defects and ethical controversy have brought enormous challenges to its own development. This article will briefly discuss the development and challenges of gene editing technology, as well as the views at home and abroad, and hope to inspire readers to recognize gene editing technology.
-
Starting the conversation: CRISPR's role in India.
The applications of gene editing technologies such as CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) have grown significantly in recent years. Several countries have adopted different stances on the regulation of such technology; however, India does not have any legally enforceable regulations in place. There is a need for such a development as India's regulatory, sociocultural, and economic landscape is unique. First, we discuss the uncertainty regarding India's regulatory capacity to enforce ethical standards for CRISPR use. Then, we discuss unique driving forces that could lead to the misuse of CRISPR in India, such as certain sociocultural norms like preferences for fair skin and public demand for sex determination. Given these previous concerns, we posit the question; where on the priority list does CRISPR stand in the context of public health in India?
-
Reply to: Atomic bomb and CRISPR gene editing technology.
-
Scientists make precise gene edits to mitochondrial DNA for first time.
-
Disruption of miRNA sequences by TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 induces varied lengths of miRNA production.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are 20-24 nucleotides (nt) small RNAs functioning in eukaryotes. The length and sequence of miRNAs are not only related to the biogenesis of miRNAs but are also important for downstream physiological processes like ta-siRNA production. To investigate these roles, it is informative to create small mutations within mature miRNA sequences. We used both TALENs (transcription activator-like effector nucleases) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) to introduce heritable base pair mutations in mature miRNA sequences. For rice, TALEN constructs were built targeting five different mature miRNA sequences and yielding heritable mutations. Among the resulting mutants, mir390 mutant showed a severe defect in the shoot apical meristem (SAM), a shootless phenotype, which could be rescued by the wild-type MIR390. Small RNA sequencing showed the two base pair deletion in mir390 substantially interfered with miR390 biogenesis. In Arabidopsis, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of the miR160* strand confirmed that the asymmetric structure of miRNA is not a necessary determinant for secondary siRNA production. CRISPR/Cas9 with double-guide RNAs successfully generated mir160a null mutants with fragment deletions, at a higher efficiency than a single-guide RNA. The difference between the phenotypic severity of miR160a mutants in Col-0 versus Ler backgrounds highlights a diverged role for miR160a in different ecotypes. Overall, we demonstrated that TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9 are both effective in modifying miRNA precursor structure, disrupting miRNA processing and generating miRNA null mutant plants.
-
An anti-CRISPR from a virulent streptococcal phage inhibits Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9.
The CRISPR-Cas system owes its utility as a genome-editing tool to its origin as a prokaryotic immune system. The first demonstration of its activity against bacterial viruses (phages) is also the first record of phages evading that immunity 1 . This evasion can be due to point mutations 1 , large-scale deletions 2 , DNA modifications 3 , or phage-encoded proteins that interfere with the CRISPR-Cas system, known as anti-CRISPRs (Acrs) 4 . The latter are of biotechnological interest, as Acrs can serve as off switches for CRISPR-based genome editing 5 . Every Acr characterized to date originated from temperate phages, genomic islands, or prophages 4-8 , and shared properties with the first Acr discovered. Here, with a phage-oriented approach, we have identified an unrelated Acr in a virulent phage of Streptococcus thermophilus. In challenging a S. thermophilus strain CRISPR-immunized against a set of virulent phages, we found one that evaded the CRISPR-encoded immunity >40,000× more often than the others. Through systematic cloning of its genes, we identified an Acr solely responsible for the abolished immunity. We extended our findings by demonstrating activity in another S. thermophilus strain, against unrelated phages, and in another bacterial genus immunized using the heterologous SpCas9 system favoured for genome editing. This Acr completely abolishes SpCas9-mediated immunity in our assays.
-
GABA-enriched tomato is first CRISPR-edited food to enter market.
PubMed returns only the first 10,000 results — refine the query to see the rest.