PubMed · NCBI

Search PubMed

Keywords, author, journal, years — results from PubMed, abstracts with Russian translation, bookmarks in your browser.

Found: 26 051

Page 13 of 1000
  1. Nature · 2018 · PMID 29730672

    From CRISPR scissors to virus sensors.

    Kocak DD, Gersbach CA

    No abstract

    PubMed ↗
  2. Plant Biotechnol J · 2021 · PMID 32640102

    Base editing with high efficiency in allotetraploid oilseed rape by A3A-PBE system.

    Cheng H, Hao M, Ding B, Mei D, Wang W, Wang H et al.

    CRISPR/Cas-base editing is an emerging technology that could convert a nucleotide to another type at the target site. In this study, A3A-PBE system consisting of human A3A cytidine deaminase fused with a Cas9 nickase and uracil glycosylase inhibitor was established and developed in allotetraploid Brassica napus. We designed three sgRNAs to target ALS, RGA and IAA7 genes, respectively. Base-editing efficiency was demonstrated to be more than 20% for all the three target genes. Target sequencing results revealed that the editing window ranged from C1 to C10 of the PAM sequence. Base-edited plants of ALS conferred high herbicide resistance, while base-edited plants of RGA or IAA7 exhibited decreased plant height. All the base editing could be genetically inherited from T0 to T1 generation. Several Indel mutations were confirmed at the target sites for all the three sgRNAs. Furthermore, though no C to T substitution was detected at the most potential off-target sites, large-scale SNP variations were determined through whole-genome sequencing between some base-edited and wild-type plants. These results revealed that A3A-PBE base-editing system could effectively convert C to T substitution with high-editing efficiency and broadened editing window in oilseed rape. Mutants for ALS, IAA7 and RGA genes could be potentially applied to confer herbicide resistance for weed control or with better plant architecture suitable for mechanic harvesting.

    PubMed ↗
  3. Methods · 2021 · PMID 34389459

    The current CRISPR methods.

    Lei H, Liu GS

    No abstract

    PubMed ↗
  4. Cell Prolif · 2020 · PMID 32350961

    Comparison of gene disruption induced by cytosine base editing-mediated iSTOP with CRISPR/Cas9-mediated frameshift.

    Dang L, Li G, Wang X, Huang S, Zhang Y, Miao Y et al.

    OBJECTIVES: Recently developed CRISPR-dependent cytosine base editor (CBE), converting four codons (CAA, CAG, CGA and TGG) into stop codons without DNA double-strand breaks (DSB), serves as an efficient gene disruption strategy besides uncontrollable CRISPR-mediated frameshift. However, the detailed difference of gene knockout between the two systems has not been clarified. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here, we selected some sgRNAs with different position background, then HEK293T cells were transfected with CBE/Cas9 plasmids together with sgRNAs. GFP-positive cells were harvested by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) 48 hours after transfection. Genomic DNA was collected for deep sequencing to analyse editing efficiency and genotype. RNA and protein were extracted to analyse gene mRNA level using qPCR analysis and Western blot. RESULTS: Here, we compared the gene disruption by CBE-mediated iSTOP with CRISPR/Cas9-mediated frameshift. We found BE-mediated gene knockout yielded fewer genotypes. BE-mediated gene editing precisely achieved silencing of two neighbouring genes, while CRISPR/Cas9 may delete the large fragment between two target sites. All of three stop codons could efficiently disrupt the target genes. It is worth notifying, Cas9-mediated gene knockout showed a more impact on neighbouring genes mRNA level than the BE editor. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal the differences between the two gene knockout strategies and provide useful information for choosing the appropriate gene disruption strategy.

    PubMed ↗
  5. PLoS One · 2025 · PMID 40327602

    CRISPR genome editing using a combined positive and negative selection system.

    Sharma I, Hall K, Moonah S

    The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas system is a powerful genome editing tool that has revolutionized research. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most common form of genetic variation in humans. Only a subset of these SNPs has been shown to be linked to genetic diseases, while the biological relevance of the majority remains unclear. Investigating these variants of unknown significance could provide valuable insights into their roles in biological processes, disease susceptibility, and treatment responses. While CRISPR/Cas has emerged as a transformative technology, its ability to make single nucleotide substitutions remains a significant limitation. Other techniques in single nucleotide editing, such as base editing and prime editing, offer promising possibilities to complement CRISPR/Cas systems, though they also have their own limitations. Hence, alternative approaches are necessary to overcome the limitations of CRISPR. Here, to improve the feasibility of generating single base edits in the genome, we provide a protocol that introduces a multiple expression and dual selection (MEDS) system, which, alongside CRISPR, utilizes the opposing roles of cytosine deaminase/uracil phosphoribosyltransferase (CD/UPRT) for negative selection and neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPT II) for positive selection. As a proof of concept and to demonstrate feasibility of the method, we used MEDS, along with traditional CRISPR-Cas9, to generate sickle hemoglobin by introducing a point mutation (A → T) in the sixth codon of the hemoglobin beta gene.

    PubMed ↗
  6. Nat Commun · 2023 · PMID 37188660

    GalNAc-Lipid nanoparticles enable non-LDLR dependent hepatic delivery of a CRISPR base editing therapy.

    Kasiewicz LN, Biswas S, Beach A, Ren H, Dutta C, Mazzola AM et al.

    Lipid nanoparticles have demonstrated utility in hepatic delivery of a range of therapeutic modalities and typically deliver their cargo via low-density lipoprotein receptor-mediated endocytosis. For patients lacking sufficient low-density lipoprotein receptor activity, such as those with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, an alternate strategy is needed. Here we show the use of structure-guided rational design in a series of mouse and non-human primate studies to optimize a GalNAc-Lipid nanoparticle that allows for low-density lipoprotein receptor independent delivery. In low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient non-human primates administered a CRISPR base editing therapy targeting the ANGPTL3 gene, the introduction of an optimized GalNAc-based asialoglycoprotein receptor ligand to the nanoparticle surface increased liver editing from 5% to 61% with minimal editing in nontargeted tissues. Similar editing was noted in wild-type monkeys, with durable blood ANGPTL3 protein reduction up to 89% six months post dosing. These results suggest that GalNAc-Lipid nanoparticles may effectively deliver to both patients with intact low-density lipoprotein receptor activity as well as those afflicted by homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

    PubMed ↗
  7. Stem Cell Res · 2024 · PMID 39018827

    Establishment of human embryonic stem cell lines carrying LQT1 mutations by CRISPR base editing.

    Wang X, Gao J, Liu C, Sun J

    The KCNQ1 gene encodes a voltage-gated potassium channel required for cardiac action potentials. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hereditary long QT syndrome 1, Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndromes, and familial atrial fibrillation. The NM_000218.3(KCNQ1): c.604 + 2T > C mutation has been categorized as the causative variant leading to LQT1. In this study, we generated a KCNQ1 (c.644 + 2T > C) mutation human embryonic stem cell line WAe009-A-1L based on CRISPR base editing system. WAe009-A-1L cell has the potential to differentiate cardiomyocytes and would be used as an in vitro disease model for mechanism exploration and drug screening.

    PubMed ↗
  8. CRISPR J · 2022 · PMID 35191754

    CRISPR Rewrites the Future of Medicine.

    Barrangou R

    No abstract

    PubMed ↗
  9. Nat Microbiol · 2021 · PMID 34799728

    CRISPR meets caspase.

    Hochstrasser ML, Nuñez JK

    No abstract

    PubMed ↗
  10. Exp Mol Med · 2025 · PMID 40745000

    Revolutionizing CRISPR technology with artificial intelligence.

    Kim MG, Go MJ, Kang SH, Jeong SH, Lim K

    Genome engineering has made remarkable strides, evolving from DNA-binding proteins such as zinc fingers and transcription activator-like effectors to CRISPR-Cas systems. CRISPR technology has revolutionized the field through its simplicity and ability to target specific genome regions via guide RNA and Cas proteins. Progress in CRISPR tools-CRISPR nucleases, base editors and prime editors-has expanded the toolkit to induce targeted insertions or deletions, nucleotide conversions and a wider array of genetic alterations. Nevertheless, variations in editing outcomes across cell types and unintended off-target effects still present substantial hurdles. Artificial intelligence (AI), which has seen rapid advances, provides high-level solutions to these problems. By leveraging large datasets from diverse experiments, AI enhances guide RNA design, predicts off-target activities and improves editing efficiency. In addition, AI aids in discovering and designing novel CRISPR systems beyond natural limitations. These developments provide new modalities essential for the innovation of personalized therapies and help to ensure efficiency, precision and safety. Here we discuss the transformative role of AI in advancing CRISPR technology. We highlight how AI contributes to refining nuclease-based editing, base editing and prime editing. Integrating AI with CRISPR technology enhances existing tools and opens doors to next-generation medicine for gene therapy.

    PubMed ↗

PubMed returns only the first 10,000 results — refine the query to see the rest.